Везде

RAS PresidiumДоклады Российской академии наук. Математика, информатика, процессы управления Doklady Mathematics

  • ISSN (Print) 2686-9543
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5049

ONTOLOGIES AS A FOUNDATION FOR FORMALIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION AND EXTRACTING NEW KNOWLEDGE

You can
PII
10.31857/S2686954324060122-1
DOI
10.31857/S2686954324060122
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N. V. Lukashevich
  • Affiliation: Research Computing Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University
M. V. Kozlova
  • Affiliation: Branch of Lomonosov Moscow State University in the city of Sevastopol
Volume/ Edition
Volume 520 / Issue number 1
Pages
82-89
Abstract
“Ark of Knowledge” is a digital project developed by M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University. It provides access to fundamental knowledge in Russian and should play a key role in the preservation and dissemination of Russia’s cultural and scientific heritage. “Ark of Knowledge” is an ontological information system. The article discusses modern ideas about ontology, stages of creation, ontological features of BDT and Wikidata, as well as the design of an information system and the use of language models for training. The initial working prototype of this information system is briefly described. Work on creating the system is being carried out by researchers and programmers from the Knowledge Engineering Laboratory of the Institute for Mathematical Research of Complex Systems of Moscow State University, as well as scientists from the Faculty of Philology, Mechanics and Mathematics, the Faculty of Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics, and the Branch of Moscow State University in Sevastopol.
Keywords
онтология информационная система фундаментальные знания проектирование онтологии информационная система “Ковчег знаний” Большая российская энциклопедия
Date of publication
15.02.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
44

References

  1. 1. Еременко Г. О. Elibrary.ru: курс на повышение качества контента // Университетская книга, 2016, 3. С. 62–68.
  2. 2. Ginsparg P. ArXiv at 20 // Nature, 2011, 476(7359). P. 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/476145a
  3. 3. Jain S. M. Introduction to transformers for NLP: With the Hugging Face library and models to solve problems // Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2022. P. 51–67. ISBN: 9781484288443.
  4. 4. Wang K., Shen Z., Huang C.-Y. et al. Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough // Quantitative Science Studies, 2020, 1(1). P. 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00021
  5. 5. Lund B. D., Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? // Library hi tech news, 2023, 40(3). P. 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009
  6. 6. Haider J., Söderström K. R. Ekström B. et al. GPTfabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar: Key features, spread, and implications for preempting evidence manipulation // Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2024, 5(5). P. 1–16.
  7. 7. Dadkhah M., Oermann M. H., Hegedüs M. et al. Detection of fake papers in the era of artificial intelligence // Diagnosis, 2023, 10(4). P. 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2023-0090
  8. 8. Wittau J., Seifert R. How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem // NaunynSchmiedeberg’s archives of pharmacology, 2024. P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-024-03272-8
  9. 9. Kendall G., da Silva J. A. T. Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills // Learned Publishing, 2024, 37(1). P. 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1578
  10. 10. Tirumala K., Simig D., Aghajanyan A. et al. D4: Improving LLM pretraining via document deduplication and diversification // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023, 36. P. 53983–53995. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.12284
  11. 11. Beltagy I., Lo K., Cohen A. SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text // Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 2019. P. 3615–3620. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1371
  12. 12. Gerasimenko N. A., Chernyavsky A. S., Nikiforova M. A. RuSciBERT: A transformer language model for obtaining semantic embeddings of scientific texts in Russian // Doklady Mathematics, 2022, 106, Suppl 1. P. S95–S96. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562422060072
  13. 13. Горячко В. В., Бубнов А. С., Раевский Е. В., Семенов А. Л. Цифровой ковчег знаний // Доклады Российской академии наук. Математика, информатика, процессы управления, 2022, 508(1). С. 128–133. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686954322070098
  14. 14. Hogan A., Blomqvist E., Cochez M, et al. Knowledge graphs // ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 2021, 54(4). P. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/344777
  15. 15. Dong X., Gabrilovich E., Heitz G., et al. Knowledge vault: A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion // Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, 2014. P. 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1145/2623330.2623623
  16. 16. Vrandečić D., Krötzsch M. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase // Communications of the ACM, 2014, 57(10). P. 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629489
  17. 17. Shenoy K., Ilievski F., Daniel Garijo D., et al. A study of the quality of Wikidata // Journal of Web Semantics, 2022, 72. P. 100679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100679
  18. 18. Hug S. E., Ochsner M., Brändle M. P. Citation analysis with Microsoft academic // Scientometrics, 2017, 111. P. 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2247-8
  19. 19. Васенин В. А. Афонин С. А., Голомазова Д. Д. и др. Интеллектуальная система тематического исследования научно-технической информации (ИСТИНА) // Информационное общество, 2013, 1–2. С. 39–57.
  20. 20. Козицын А. С., Афонин С. А. Алгоритм разрешения неоднозначности имен авторов в ИАС ИСТИНА // Современные информационные технологии и ИТ-образование, 2020, 16(1). С. 108–117. https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.16.202001.108-117
  21. 21. Семенов А. Л. Искусственный интеллект в обществе // Доклады РАН. Математика, информатика, процессы управления. Специальный выпуск “Технологии искусственного интеллекта и машинного обучения”. 2023, 514(2). С. 6–19. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686954323350023
  22. 22. Wille R. Formal Concept Analysis as Mathematical Theory of Concepts and Concept Hierarchies // In: Ganter B., Stumme G., Wille R. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3626. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. P. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/11528784_1
  23. 23. Лукашевич Н. В., Добров Б. В., Павлов А. М., Штернов С. В. Онтологические ресурсы и информационно-аналитическая система в предметной области “безопасность” // Онтология проектирования, 2018, 1(27). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ontologicheskie-resursy-i-informionno-analiticheskaya-sis-tema-v-predmetnoy-oblasti-bezopasnost (дата обращения: 01.10.2024).
  24. 24. Семенов А. Л., Раевский Е. Н., Бубнов А. С. и др. Универсальная энциклопедическая платформа работы со знанием // Современные информационные технологии и ИТ-образование. 2023, 19(3). С. 696–703.
  25. 25. https://doi.org/10.25559/SITITO.019.202303.696-703
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library