RAS PresidiumДоклады Российской академии наук. Математика, информатика, процессы управления Doklady Mathematics

  • ISSN (Print) 2686-9543
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5049

Sufficient condition for polynomial solvability of random 3-CNF formulas

PII
10.31857/S2686954324040067-1
DOI
10.31857/S2686954324040067
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 518 / Issue number 1
Pages
35-39
Abstract
This paper is devoted to the localisation of random 3-CNF formulas that are polynomially solvable by the resolution algorithm. It is shown that random formulas with the number of clauses proportional to the square of the number of variables, are polynomially solvable with probability close to unity when the proportionality coefficient exceeds the found threshold.
Keywords
3-КНФ дизъюнкт резолюция алгоритмическая сложность задача выполнимости
Date of publication
15.06.2024
Year of publication
2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
35

References

  1. 1. Cook S. The Importance of the P versus NP Question // JACM. 2003. V. 50. P. 27–29.
  2. 2. Biere A., Heule M., Maaren H., Walsh T. Handbook of Satisfiability (Second Edition). IOS Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA336
  3. 3. Gomes C., Rautz H., Sabharwal A., Selman B. Satisfiability Solvers // Handbook of Knowledge Representation. 2008. P. 89–133.
  4. 4. Beame P., Kautz H.A., Sabharwal A. Towards Understanding and Harnessing the Potential of Clause Learning // Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2004. V. 22. P. 319–351.
  5. 5. Ganesh V., Vardi M. On the Unreasonable Effectiveness of SAT Solvers // Beyond the Worst-Case Analysis of Algorithms. 2020. P. 547–566.
  6. 6. Kirkpatrick S., Selman B. Critical Behavior in the Satisfiability of Random Boolean Expressions // Science. 1994. V. 264. № 5163. P. 1297–1301.
  7. 7. Merzard M., Parisi G., Zecchina R. Analitic and Algorithmic Solution of Random Satisfiability Problems // Science. 2002. V. 297. P. 812–815.
  8. 8. Kaporis A.C., Kirousis L.M., Laias E.G. The Probabilistic Analysis of a Greedy Satisfiability Algorithm // Random Structures and Algorithms. 2006. V. 28. № 4. P. 444–480.
  9. 9. Broder A.Z., Frieze A.M., Upfal E. On the Satisfiability and Maximum Satisfiability of Random 3-CNF Formulas // In 4th ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. SIAM. 1993. P. 322–330.
  10. 10. Mitzenmacher M. Tight Thresholds for the Pure Literal Rule // DEC/SRC Technical Note 1997–011. 1997.
  11. 11. Haken A. The Intractability of Resolution // Theoretical Computer Science. 1985. V. 39. P. 297–308.
  12. 12. Алехнович М.В., Разборов А.А. Нижние оценки для полиномиального исчисления в случае идеалов, отличных от биномиальных // Труды математического института им. В.А. Стеклова. 2003. Т. 242. С. 23–43.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library